Valuation Engagement vs. Calculation Engagement in Business Valuations – What’s the Difference?

Reading Time: 3 minutes, 51 seconds

When hiring a valuation specialist to estimate the value of a company or ownership interest in a company, there are two types of engagement formats of which you need to be aware. Under the AICPA’s Statement on Standards for Valuation Services No. 1 (SSVS No.1), the two types of engagements are a valuation engagement and a calculation engagement

Valuation Engagement: In a valuation engagement, the valuation analyst is free to apply the valuation approaches (i.e. – income, asset and/or market approaches) he or she deems appropriate under the circumstances.  A valuation engagement typically requires more procedures than a calculation engagement

Calculation Engagement: For a calculation engagement, the valuation analyst and the client agree on the valuation approaches and methods that will be performed in estimating value. In other words, there is a scope limitation on the procedures and methods applied.   This contrasts with the valuation engagement where no scope limitation is imposed. 

Fees for calculation engagements are generally less than the fees charged for valuation engagements. This is because conducting a calculation engagement takes less time since it is not as comprehensive as a valuation engagement.

Depending on the purpose of the business valuation, caution should be used when selecting a calculation engagement since it doesn’t call for allof the procedures required in a valuation engagement.  In fact, calculation engagements are mandated to include the following disclaimer language in the report “Had a valuation engagement been performed, the results might have been different”.

The following depicts two scenarios showing the difference between a valuation engagement and a calculation engagement:

Scenario 1: For internal use purposes, a business owner approaches a valuation analyst to determine the value of his/her business and they agree that the analyst use only pricing multiples from industry transactions (under the market method) in determining value. The implication here is that other methods (such as income and asset approaches) will be disregarded. This is considered a calculation engagement.

Scenario 2: For IRS tax reporting purposes, a business owner approaches a valuation analyst to determine the value of a business and they agree that the analyst be given full discretion as to the methodologies he/she deem appropriate in determining the value.  The implication here is that all methodologies are to be considered by the analyst since there is no scope limitation. This would be considered a valuation engagement.

The SSVS No.1 generally gives the analyst wide latitude in how a calculation engagement is conducted. The standards do not prohibit the use of a calculation engagement – even for tax-related (IRS) purposes.  However, it is highly recommended that calculation engagements are not used in IRS related matters (the higher-level valuation engagement should be used).  It is up to the analyst to decide if the calculation analysis and report will fulfill IRS gift and estate tax requirements.   Under certain circumstances the IRS may accept a calculation engagement; but, the tax authorities generally require a full valuation analysis and report.

In a litigation setting, the use of a calculation engagement is generally discouraged since the disclaimer language noted above can mean all sorts of challenges from opposing parties. However, there are instances where they can be very useful. If all parties agree to a calculation engagement format, it can be a cost and time saver.  Also, a common strategy is to have a calculation performed for a “preliminary” estimate of value – possibly for negotiation purposes – with the caveat that the analyst reserves the right to expand the engagement to a full valuation analysis if the case goes to trial. 

Whether a calculation engagement is appropriate in litigation depends, of course, on the legal venue of the case and the acceptance of the attorney(s).  

Other circumstances that frequently call for a calculation instead of a higher-level valuation analysis include the need for a “ballpark” value for management’s internal use (i.e. – not for third-party use).  Whatever the reason for a calculation engagement, the analyst needs to clearly explain what the user can expect from this “lower-level” analysis. This includes communicating the specific procedures to be performed, the scope limitations imposed, the reporting of the results, and the degree of reliance placed on the analysis.  

Regardless of what type of valuation is performed, always be sure to utilize the services of a professional who is has the appropriate designations or certifications in business valuations from the various reputable organizations (AICPA, NACVA (National Association of Certified Valuators and Analysts), IBA (Institute of Business Appraisers, ASA(American Society of Appraisers), etc.).  


Contact Us

Stay up-to-date

Remain informed and connected. Follow us and join our mailing list.

Savannah
Atlanta – Norcross
Miami
Atlanta – Powers Ferry
Augusta
Tampa